Monday, August 2, 2010
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Doubling Down on Housing - WSJ.com
Monday, July 26, 2010
WSJ: Ten Stock-Market Myths That Just Won't Die
Excerpt:
1 "This is a good time to invest in the stock market."
Really? Ask your broker when he warned clients that it was a bad time to invest. October 2007? February 2000? A broken watch tells the right time twice a day, but that's no reason to wear one. Or as someone once said, asking a broker if this is a good time to invest in the stock market is like asking a barber if you need a haircut. "Certainly, sir -- step this way!"
2 "Stocks on average make you about 10% a year."
Stop right there. This is based on some past history -- stretching back to the 1800s -- and it's full of holes.
About three of those percentage points were only from inflation. The other 7% may not be reliable either. The data from the 19th century are suspect; the global picture from the 20th century is complex. Experts suggest 5% may be more typical. And stocks only produce average returns if you buy them at average valuations. If you buy them when they're expensive, you do a lot worse.
3 "Our economists are forecasting..."
Hold it. Ask your broker if the firm's economist predicted the most recent recession -- and if so, when.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB128000197220920621.html
Sunday, July 25, 2010
The Disappearing Dollars
got a clue
http://www.marketskeptics.com/2010/07/disappearing-dollars.html
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Hayek, Trade Restrictions, And The Great Depression - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
It's a good first step.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/hayek-trade-restrictions-and-the-great-depression/
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Walking Away From Million-Dollar Mortgages - NYTimes.com
"The rich are different: they are more ruthless"
Monday, July 5, 2010
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Damon Vrabel
Damon Vrabel graduated from the United States Military Academy, served as an officer in the US Army, then graduated from Harvard Business School, took a short detour on Wall Street, and had a career in Silicon Valley in several leadership positions in technology corporations.
Recent Canada Free Press Articles
Renaissance 2.0 Videos
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Dow below 10,000
http://cfcsux.blogspot.com/2010/05/yanking-on-leash.html
23 Doomsayers Who Say We're Heading Toward Depression In 2011
Voltron says: But Obama and Bernanke say the economy is "stengthening"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100629/ts_afp/useconomyobama_20100629170100http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100629/ts_afp/useconomyobama_20100629170100
Voltron says: by the time anyone in government utters a discouraging word about the economy, it will be too late. In fact, it will probably mark the nadir
Banks Financing Mexico Drug Gangs Admitted in Wells Fargo Deal - Bloomberg
Monday, June 28, 2010
Fed Economist: Bloggers are Stupid
A Richmond Va. Federal Reserve Economist, Kartik Athreya wrote a paper recently that trashes economic bloggers. Mr. Artheya has a PhD from the University of Iowa. I'm not so sure a few years in corn land gives him the right to take cheap shots at the new media. I am absolutely convinced that this type of thinking should not be expressed by Fed officials. It proves to me that the Fed is an elitist organization that is out of touch with America in 2010. The full report from Athreya is here. Some of the more offending comments:
Writers who have not taken a year of PhD coursework in a decent economics department (and passed their PhD qualifying exams), cannot meaningfully advance the discussion on economic policy.
So we have to go to school for two years to be able to write about the issues of the day. That would exclude me and a lot of others. The fact that I worked on Walls street for 30 years does not qualify me to say a word.
The response of the untrained to the crisis has been even more startling. I listen to Elizabeth Warren on the radio fearlessly speculating about the nature of credit market dysfunction, and so on.
Taking on Elizabeth Warren is a big mistake Mr. Arthreya. You will regret this choice of words.
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new. Moreover, there is a substantial likelihood that it will instead offer something incoherent or misleading.
Everything that comes from the Federal Reserve is incoherent and misleading.
The sophomoric musings of auto-didact or non-didact bloggers or writers is instructive. For those who want to really know what the best that economics has to offer is, you must look here.
The only people you should listen to is Federal Reserve economists? I take a different view. The last people you should trust in this matter is FRB economists.
The general public are simply being had by the bulk of the economic blogging crowd.
The general public is being had. But not by the bloggers. They are being had by the folks who make the choices for us at the FRB.
The views expressed are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, or Federal Reserve System.
Actually the views expressed are a perfect representation of the mind set at the FRB. Narrow minded, elitist and just plain wrong.
I would suggest that Mr. Arthreya do some additional research. He should look up the word "hubris" (extreme haughtiness or arrogance). After he understands that concept he should write an apology, that or he should resign from the FRB.
Friday, June 25, 2010
Wells Fargo: Money Flow Leader
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703615104575328851710485606.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Worried About Their Dollars, More Are Turning to Gold - NYTimes.com
Voltron says: don't buy from goldline; they overcharge. Check prices
at kitco.com
NYTimes - Waking Up From the American Dream
"You hear all this rhetoric about stability caused by homeownership," ... "But the communities that survived the housing bubble the best were the ones that had the highest percentage of renters."
a home mortgage deduction ... essentially "bribes people to buy bigger houses." ... renters offer plenty of social good themselves, helping creating vibrant cities. "The idea that homeownership is always great and renting is un-American is an awful state of affairs," he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/business/12nocera.html?pagewanted=all
Friday, June 11, 2010
Financial Armageddon: 'Alarmingly Bleak' and 'Littered with Huge and Half-Empty Glasses'
"An optimist sees the glass as half full. A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. I see the glass as twice as big as it needs to be,"
Thursday, June 10, 2010
SDS, BP money flow leaders
UltraShort S&P500 ProShares ETF (SDS) topped the list at midday for Buying on Weakness , which tracks stocks that fell in price but had the largest inflow of money.
British Petroleum (BP) topped the list for Selling on Strength , which tracks stocks that rose in price but had the largest outflow of money.
See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298722612559374.html for the full list of money flow leaders.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Waterboarding the Laws of Economics
I'm not certain who it was that said There is no situation so bad that government cannot make it worse, but as proof of that axiom, I offer the following: [Thanks L!]
Last week, three House members introduced a $15 billion stimulus bill to provide homebuilders with construction loans. Yep - the plan is to build more houses in an attempt to save the housing industry from its oversupply of houses. Irony just died.
. . .
There's ample reason to believe this bill will do more bad than good, and arguments used to justify its existence are easy to shoot down.The National Association of Home Builders, for example, wrote that without this bill and its fostering of new construction, we'd threaten "to end the budding housing recovery before it has time to take root." That's so perfectly wrong, it hurts. You have to put the laws of supply and demand in a medieval torture device to come up with an example of additional supply healing a crash caused by oversupply. When the price of something is falling, increasing supply accelerates the drop. Conversely, removing supply (blowing up houses) lifts prices. No secrets. No magic. No tricks. They call these the laws of supply and demand because there aren't practical exceptions.
Perhaps it's "Hair of the dog that bit him," economic theory. It makes no sense, but which of the stimulus bills did?
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Bonds could lose 30 percent of their value
Excerpt:
Bob Froehlich with Hartford Mutual Funds says ... the bubble could pop when the Fed does what it'll have to do to stave off inflation -- raise interest rates. He says when that happens, today's bonds could lose 30 percent of their value if they're resold on the secondary market.
http://marketplace.publicradio.org//display/web/2010/06/08/pm-concern-over-a-bond-market-bubble
History lesson
I keep reading everywhere that Greece is the new Lehman Brothers .... Lehman itself was the new Argentina (2001), and Argentina was the new CreditAnstalt (1931), and CreditAnstalt was the new previous Argentina (1890), and the previous Argentina was the new South Sea Company (1720), which was the new Philip II of Spain, who through his multiple defaults (1557, 1560, 1575, 1596) managed repeatedly to be the new himself. Governments and bankers have been merrily tossing the bankruptcy baton back and forth for half a millennium.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1a9cf0ac-7019-11df-8698-00144feabdc0.html
Monday, June 7, 2010
Rapper Chamillionaire Strategically Defaults
...His 7,583 square foot mansion in Houston, Texas was a losing endeavor, and ... he simply chose to walk away . . .
Chamillionaire played down the severity of the situation, telling TMZ, “when I’m Chathousandaire, then y’all have a real story.”
http://www.thetruthaboutmortgage.com/rapper-chamillionaire-strategically-defaults/
Next, Lil Jon defaults . . .
Voltron: Lil Jon, you're house is underwater
Lil Jon: What?!?!
Voltron: You owe more than it's worth
Lil Jon: What?!?!
Voltron: Do you want to stop losing money?
Lil Jon: YEAH!!!
Voltron: You should let the bank foreclose
Lil Jon: OKAY!!!!
with sound effects: http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/15215/detail/
Saturday, June 5, 2010
The Greek Crisis Explained (video)
The Greek Crisis Explained, Episode 1 from NOMINT on Vimeo.
Voltron says: I like the helicopter
The Greek Crisis Explained, Episode 2 from NOMINT on Vimeo.
The Greek Crisis Explained, Episode 3 from NOMINT on Vimeo.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Friday, May 28, 2010
Max Keiser: Big Banks Allocate Losing Trades to Clients, Keep Winning Trades for Themselves
David Einhorn: Easy Money, Hard Truths
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Hugh Henry: "I recommend you panic" . . .
Video and partial transcript: http://www.businessinsider.com/hugh-hendry-vs-jeffrey-sachs-2010-5
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Saturday, May 22, 2010
FHA-HAMP Helped 171 Homeowners Nationwide in April
http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2010/05/fha-hamp-helped-171-homeowners-nationwide-in-april
Here's why:
The traditional compensation model for servicers is based on a flat percentage of a loans outstanding in the portfolio. On conventional loans, servicers are generally paid between 0.25 and 375% of total unpaid loan principle in their portfolio. Every incremental dollar spent counseling borrowers and mitigating the losses of the end investor (not their own losses) is cutting into the servicers margin.
http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/channels/voiceofhousing/153523.aspx
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Germany bans short selling of some stocks and bonds
Voltron says: This takes effect at midnight at is in force until 31 March 2011. The US enacted a similar ban, just as hastily, during September 2008, with disastrous results. Short sellers are the only buyers in a crashing market when they close out their positions, so when you ban short selling, you create a vacuum under the market.
See my previous blog posts from Sept 08:
Nassim Taleb: Robustness and Fragility
Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence.”
Let us move voluntarily into a robust economy by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalizing the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here (by claiming restitution of the funds paid to, say, Robert Rubin or banksters whose wealth has been subsidized by taxpaying schoolteachers), and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties. Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller firms, a richer ecology, no speculative leverage—a world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks, and in which companies are born and die every day without making the news.
Voltron says: Nassim's hedge fund, "Universa", was at one point accused of causing the 1,000 point "Flash Crash" of 2:45 on May 6th. Here is a video of Nassim (briefly) addressing that and other matters:
Monday, May 17, 2010
‘There’s No Money Left,’ U.K. Minister Learns From Predecessor
According to Laws, it read: "Dear Chief Secretary, I'm afraid to tell you there's no money left."
"Which was honest," Laws, whose position is the No. 2 in the Treasury after the chancellor of the exchequer, told a press conference in London today. "But slightly less than I was expecting."
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=azCbhNNMdg98&pos=9
Reindexing The Unemployment Rate
Reindexing The Unemployment Rate By America's Population Growth Yields Some Ugly Results
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/reindexing-unemployment-population-growth-yields-some-ugly-results
GM Wants More Subprime Lending
but it sold it's finance arm in 2006 and no one is the the mood to
make subprime car loans.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gm-wants-more-subprime-lending-2010-5
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Financial Crisis
"an event that forces policy officials to spend a long weekend trying desperately to announce a new bailout package in order to avoid national and global panic before the markets open on Monday."
Despite a trillion dollar bailout and pledge to defend the Euro, the Euro has crashed to an 18 month low. That's it . . . Europe fired it's bailout bullet . . . and missed. Paul Krugman is panicing.
German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said the bailout may not work.
Former Fed Chairman Paul Volker said the Euro may brake up.
California Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger compared California to Greece while announcing crushing budget cuts.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Newsweek: Strategic Defaults On The Rise
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Mortgages-Strategic-Defaults-bizwk-2756669544.html?x=0&.v=1
Monday, May 10, 2010
Wells Fargo is rotten
"I think it is a bad idea to answer these questions right now,"
"We never admit to 'having problems.'"
"Is there a likelihood of a rush to the exits [by clients]?"
"Admitting to losses ... is a big deal for all future business."
"We haven't communicated about this at all. It feels like a ticking time bomb without telling our clients."
http://www.startribune.com/business/93143674.html?elr=KArks:DCiU1PciUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU
CBS 60 Minutes: "Strategic Default: Walking Away from Mortgages"
Banks, with the help of the government, are offering some relief to homeowners who've lost jobs and just can't meet their payments.
But there's a growing number who can pay but are simply walking away from houses that are now worth as little as half of what they paid for them.
It's called "strategic default." People have done the math and decided making those monthly payments is just throwing money away, leaving the mortgage holders - the banks - as zookeepers of an ever-growing parade of white elephants.
In the past year it is estimated that at least a million Americans who can afford to stay in their homes simply walked away.
Video and Transcript: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/06/60minutes/main6466484.shtml
Is that all you got?
The "Euro TARP" announced after an all-nighter on Sunday right before the asian markets opened (<sarcasm on> like all carefully thought out plans <sarcasm off>) is a 700 Billion Euro (about 1,000 Billion Dollars) package of loans and loan guarantees for Greece. The 2008 US TARP was for the same nominal 700 Billion amount (in dollars). How did the US come up with 700 Billion? "It's not based on any particular data point . . . We just wanted to choose a really large number." No Kidding. If this package is a good bailout, why didn't they do it last week, last month, last year, 10 years ago and why don't they do another trillion tomorrow and the day after that? By the way, it's a preview of the coming US bailout of California. All the European nations and the IMF (mainly the US) are going to contribute. Does it make sense for Spain to borrow money at 8% to loan to Greece at 5%? Why is the solution to debt always more debt? None of this will solve anything because the Greek citizens will not adopt austerity measures or pay their taxes and none of the money is "stimulus".
I feel exactly the way I did after the TARP bailout in 2008. "Is that all you got?" A Trillion dollars of debt thrown into hole and all they get is a modest pop in the Euro and 400 point pop in the DOW pre-market. The DOW usually goes up on Monday's when the 401k purchases come through and most of the increase in the DOW since March have been pre-market.
The Europeans are trying to hurt the speculators, but they can't. If they cushion market volatility to clam the markets, that makes options cheaper and carry trades more attractive. If they increase volatility to shake out short sellers, it will spook the markets. No matter what they do, Goldman Sachs will figure out a way to rape them. Goldman just announced that they made money EVERY TRADING DAY LAST QUARTER and make over $100 million on half of the days.
Despite all this Moody's just put Greece, Ireland and Portugal on negative ratings watch.
By the way, after the money is used to bailout the politically connected, Greece will default anyway.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Yanking on the Leash?
Moody's under SEC investigation, tugs on leash
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-moodys-gets-wells-notice-sec-may-order-ratings-agency-to-cease-and-desist-2010-5
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703338004575230882064318688.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs
Voltron says: The investigation is with respect to some 2008 constant-proportion debt obligations (CPDOs) that Moody's knew were overrated due to a "computer bug" but knowingly did not correct the error. The US may revoke Moody's charter to rate securities (NRSRO). Coincidently Moody's is now saying the the US may lose it's triple-A credit rating as soon as 2013. Unlike bond issuers, the US does not pay Moody's for ratings.
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=532490
Saturday, May 8, 2010
"The dirty little secret is: The world has no money, and the Emperor has no clothes."
Friday, May 7, 2010
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Holyfuckingshit
Voltron says: A trillion dollars was transferred during the dip. Many people had stop loss orders triggered. Was it a last desperate money grab by Citigroup or Goldman?
Way to go Freddie!
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Whitney: Banks Under-reserved for 'Double-dip' in House Prices
Banks continue to suffer from losses on non-performing loans, and U.S. home prices will fall again amid increasing supply and sluggish demand, according to [banking analyst Meredith Whitney].
“I’m steadfast in my belief there’s going to be a double- dip in housing,” she said. “You will see clearly that the banks are under-reserved when housing dips again.”
story and video: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aL7enTzxZttA
hat-tip: calculated risk
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Strategic Default Update
- $100,000 negative equity is the tipping point.
- 12 percent of all U.S. defaults in February were strategic.
- 30,000 people a month are able to pay their mortgage but are deciding not to.
http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/strategic-default-world-mortgages-30000-default-monthly-cash-flow-increase/
Monday, May 3, 2010
Fed knew of housing bubble in 2004
As top Federal Reserve officials debated whether there was a housing bubble and what to do about it, then-Chairman Alan Greenspan argued that the dissent should be kept secret so that the Fed wouldn't lose control of the debate to people less well-informed than themselves.
"We run the risk, by laying out the pros and cons of a particular argument, of inducing people to join in on the debate, and in this regard it is possible to lose control of a process that only we fully understand," Greenspan said, according to the transcripts of a March 2004 meeting.
At the same meeting, a Federal Reserve bank president from Atlanta, Jack Guynn, warned that "a number of folks are expressing growing concern about potential overbuilding and worrisome speculation in the real estate markets, especially in Florida. Entire condo projects and upscale residential lots are being pre-sold before any construction, with buyers freely admitting that they have no intention of occupying the units or building on the land but rather are counting on 'flipping' the properties--selling them quickly at higher prices."
Had Guynn's warning been heeded and the housing market cooled, the financial collapse of 2008 could have been avoided. But his comment was kept secret until Friday, when the central bank released the transcripts of Federal Open Market Committee meetings for 2004 and CalculatedRisk spotted it. The transcripts for 2005 to the present are still secret.
Voltron says: I have been a connoisseur of arrogance all my life and I must say that this is truly magnifique. Absolutely breathtaking. The current Fed Chairman and Treasury Secretary are also implicated in this cover up. "it is possible to lose control of a process that only we fully understand" WTF is that supposed to mean? Fiat currency collapse?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/03/greenspan-wanted-housing_n_560965.html
Fannie Mae tightens lending standards
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Battered by a tidal wave of loan defaults, mortgage finance company Fannie Mae is tightening standards for the adjustable-rate and interest-only loans that fed the housing boom and contributed to the bust.
The company said Friday it will require mortgage lenders to consider how high a borrower's mortgage payments might rise after teaser rates expire.
Fannie Mae also will enact tighter standards for "interest only" loans that allow borrowers to avoid making principal payments for several years. To get those loans, borrowers taking out new mortgages must have a down payment of at least 30 percent and enough assets for two months of living expenses.
Washington-based Fannie and sibling company Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and sell them to investors with a guarantee against default. They have effectively been owned by the government since they nearly collapsed in September 2008.
Voltron says: No rush though . . . the new rules take effect in September 2010.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Fannie-Mae-tightens-lending-apf-1078217196.html?x=0&.v=8
Huge FDIC Losses from 7 Bank Failures Friday
In all, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation projected $7.3 billion in losses from seven bank failures [last] Friday.
The toll is higher than the $6 billion in losses projected for IndyMac Bank FSB's failure.
No losses to the Deposit Insurance fund occurred from the failure of Washington Mutual Bank -- the biggest bank failure in U.S. history.
Friday, April 23, 2010
Wells Fargo mostly exists off balance sheet
Source : http://www.thestreet.com/story/10552223/1/wells-fargos-balancing-act.html
Excerpt from another article explains:
from Wells Fargo's third-quarter 2008 release:
"Almost all of our off-balance sheet arrangements result from securitizations [of] home mortgage loans and other financial assets, including commercial mortgages. We normally structure loan securitizations as sales, ... This involves the transfer of financial assets to certain qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that we are not required to consolidate [on the balance sheet]."
Voltron says: They subsequently removed this note from future filings.
Voltron says: structuring loans as sales is exactly what Lehman ($50 billion) and Enron ($14 Billion) did, but this is on a much larger scale ($1,900 Billion)
http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/fre-fnm-mortgage-off-balance-sheet/2/2/2009/id/20901?page=2
Bureaucracy in India
America: A Banana Republic With No Bananas
let’s look at Wikipedia’s description of the four factors which make a country a banana republic.
- Profits Privatized and Debts Socialized
- Devalued Paper Currency
- Politicians Use Time in Office to Maximize Their Own Gains
- Corruption Remains Unchecked, Politicians Are Only for Show
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/04/guest-post-a-banana-republic-with-no-bananas.html
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Wells Earnings Released
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704133804575198502855993706.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs#articleTabs%3Darticle
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Life imitates comedy
Excerpt:
The Obama Administration today released questions for public comment on the future of the housing finance system, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the overall role of the federal government in housing policy. The questions have been designed to generate input from a wide variety of constituents, including market participants, industry groups, academic experts, and consumer and community organizations. The questions will also be published in a Federal Register notice requesting public comments, and information on the process for submitting comments will be included in that notice.
"A well-functioning housing finance system is critical to the long term stability of the housing market," said Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. "Hearing from a wide variety of perspectives as we embark on this process is an important part of establishing a more stable and sound housing finance system for the American people."
Here are the actual questions:
- How should federal housing finance objectives be prioritized in the context of the broader objectives of housing policy?
- What role should the federal government play in supporting a stable, well-functioning housing finance system and what risks, if any, should the federal government bear in meeting its housing finance objectives?
- Should the government approach differ across different segments of the market, and if so, how?
- How should the current organization of the housing finance system be improved?
- How should the housing finance system support sound market practices?
- What is the best way for the housing finance system to help ensure consumers are protected from unfair, abusive or deceptive practices?
- Do housing finance systems in other countries offer insights that can help inform US reform choices?
Here's the SNL skit (from a year ago - March 2009, right at the bottom of the stock market):
Hat tip to: Blownmortgage.com
SEC charges Goldman Sachs
I've adjusted my forecast (right panel of the blog). It may be time to start getting short, while you can.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/17/business/17goldman.html
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Ratigan: Financial Fraud For Dummies (video)
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
NPR: Did WaMu's fraud lower rest of market?
Marketplace's Alisa Roth reports.
ALISA ROTH: The stories this investigation have turned up are pretty alarming. WaMu gave bonuses for selling higher risk loans. There were also bonuses for using things like higher interest rates or extra points to over-charge clients. Employees even helped loans get processed faster by falsifying bank statements.
John Coffee is an expert on securities law and corporate governance at Columbia. He says the easiest way for a bank to increase its profitability in the short-term is to take on more risk.
JOHN COFFEE: And that can arguably produce the lemming-like race over the cliff as each institution increases its level of risk because it wants to have its profitability look at least comparable to its rivals.
He says WaMu was one of a lot of institutions in the game.
http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/04/13/pm-washington-mutual-fruad/
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Jim Chanos says China has a property bubble
...so much of their GDP growth is construction -- 50 percent to 60 percent of this country’s GDP is construction. We’ve not seen that in terms of a major country I think for a long time if not at all.
And so for them to get off of stopping construction, you’ll see GDP growth go negative very quickly. That’s not going to happen, because in China it’s all about making the number.
...I’m more concerned even philosophically about the whole idea -- as we say, it’s all about the number. So in the west our economic growth is a result of decisions that you make and I make and that the market reflects via pricing, and at the end of the day we calculate all activity, and that’s our economic growth.
In China it starts with, "We are going to grow nine percent next year. Now, how do we get there?" It’s the start of the equation and the activity is the residual. And that’s ultimately philosophically the problem.
Video and Transcript: http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10960
Monday, April 12, 2010
27 Million Believe Home is Underwater
http://www.thetruthaboutmortgage.com/27-million-believe-home-is-underwater/
Bank Profits Dimmed by Prospect of Home-Equity Losses
Excerpt:
Wells Fargo holds about $123.8 billion of home-equity loans, with about $103.7 billion in a junior-lien position, according to company filings. The lender has $5.3 billion in reserves set aside to cover the second-lien mortgage loans and wrote off $4.6 billion last year. Almost 2.2 percent of the second liens are more than 120 days past due, the company said in its annual report.
CreditSights said potential home-equity losses could knock $12.8 billion, or $2.47 a share, off earnings at Wells Fargo. That's more than the $10.9 billion the bank is expected to earn this year, according to the average estimate of 15 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.
..
Second-lien reserves set aside by the four big banks are $100 billion to $125 billion short of what's needed in the next few years, said Joshua Rosner, an analyst at Graham Fisher & Co., an independent research firm based in New York, and co- author of a May 2007 report that said ratings companies were underestimating the risk of subprime-mortgage bonds.
Quotes:
"There's very little recovery for home-equity loans," -Paul Miller, FBR Capital Markets
"If banks were properly accounting for their second liens, there would be no problem with them choosing to do principal writedowns, They would already be reserved for it." - Joshua Rosner, Graham Fisher & Co.
"Banks have been saying we're close to the end, People have built that into their expectations. I don't think we're there yet." -Nancy Bush, NAB Research
"The banks are saying that they can work through it . . . it may be bigger than they are letting on." -Baylor Lancaster, CreditSights
"This is a problem that's not going away for several years," -Charles W. Scharf, JPMorgan
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601206&sid=ayhRMX.B.hJE
Sunday, April 11, 2010
NPR: Inside Job (audio)
Humor: Bet Against the American Dream (video/mp3)
mp3: http://podcast.thisamericanlife.org/special/405_Bonus_Bet_Against_the_American_Dream.mp3
Saturday, April 10, 2010
WSJ: Big Banks Mask Risk Levels
Major banks have masked their risk levels in the past five quarters by temporarily lowering their debt just before reporting it to the public, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
A group of 18 banks—which includes Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc.—understated the debt levels used to fund securities trades by lowering them an average of 42% at the end of each of the past five quarterly periods, the data show. The banks, which publicly release debt data each quarter, then boosted the debt levels in the middle of successive quarters.
Excessive borrowing by banks was one of the major causes of the financial crisis, leading to catastrophic bank runs in 2008 at firms including Bear Stearns Cos. and Lehman Brothers. Since then, banks have become more sensitive about showing high levels of debt and risk, worried that their stocks and credit ratings could be punished.
That practice, while legal, can give investors a skewed impression of the level of risk that financial firms are taking the vast majority of the time.
Voltron says: I want to know how Wells Fargo breaks out . . . anyhow Zero Hedge has a great graph summarizing the data:
Voltron says: Notice how the red dot seems to be randomly distributed within the bars then suddenly starting in Q4 2008, it is always at the bottom.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304830104575172280848939898.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_MIDDLETopNews
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/evidence-primary-dealers-have-collectively-engaged-repo-105-and-qtr-end-book-cooking-type-sc
The Magnetar Trade: How One Hedge Fund Helped Keep the Bubble Going
Excerpt:
Magnetar solved a conundrum of those who bet against the market. An investor might be confident that things are heading south, but not know when. While the investor waits, it costs money to keep the bet going. Many a short seller has run out of cash at the gates of a big payday.
...Even today, bankers and managers speak with awe at the elegance of the Magnetar Trade. Others have become famous for betting big against the housing market. But they had taken enormous risks. Meanwhile, Magnetar had created a largely self-funding bet against the market.
Explainer: http://www.propublica.org/special/the-anatomy-of-the-magnetar-trade
Full article: http://www.propublica.org/feature/all-the-magnetar-trade-how-one-hedge-fund-helped-keep-the-housing-bubble
More Gold Hanky Panky
Has The iShares Gold ETF (IAU) Been Covertly Depleted Of 90% Of Its Physical Holdings, With Banks Like JPM And Goldman Pocketing The Actual Gold?
The Latest Gold Fraud Bombshell: Canada's Only Bullion Bank Gold Vault Is Practically Empty
Got Gold? Why Owning GLD Can Be Hazardous To Your Wealth
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Bank of America to Increase Foreclosure Rate by 600% in 2010
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/blog/comments/bank-of-america-to-increase-foreclosure-rate-by-600-in-2010/
Credit Sights: "Wells Fargo is particularly vulnerable"
Excerpt:
Total home equity exposure at banks is pretty big. Amherst Securities has said commercial banks hold approximately $767 billion of the total $1.05 trillion of second mortgages outstanding, with the Big 4 holding over $400 billion alone.
But the key issue is what portion of these are at risk of writedowns. Most vulnerable are loans (or portions thereof) that are no longer backed by property. That is, the price of the underlying home has fallen below the balance on the loan. In banker shorthand: “loan-to-value” (LTV) is greater than 100%.
These are in peril because home equity loans are frequently structured with big principal payments on the back end, so even though many borrowers are currently making payments they’d need to stump up an awful lot of cash to pay off the balance. Unless housing miraculously recovers and they can sell or refinance at a price that will pay back all their debt, well, expect a spike in walk-aways…
CreditSights takes a stab at the potential writedown for the Big 4 banks and finds that Wells Fargo is particularly vulnerable.
http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/04/08/home-equity-horror/
