Tuesday, February 2, 2010

More Homeowners Walk Away

Excerpt:

“We’re now at the point of maximum vulnerability,” said Sam Khater, a senior economist with First American CoreLogic, the firm that conducted the recent research. “People’s emotional attachment to their property is melting into the air.”

Suggestions that people would be wise to renege on their home loans are at least a couple of years old, but they are turning into a full-throated barrage. Bloggers were quick to note recently that landlords of an 11,000-unit residential complex in Manhattan showed no hesitation, or shame, in walking away from their deeply underwater investment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/business/03walk.html

The Deficit

Monday, February 1, 2010

Tim is back in



President Obama literally embraced the (failed, tax dodging) Treasury Secretary before last week's State of the Union address (and did not kiss him on both cheeks - "Godfather" style)

http://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-hill-insiders-say-obama-hugging-geithner-changed-everything-2010-2

Treasury Department Is Already Saying "Volcker Rule" Won't Change Goldman Sachs

http://www.businessinsider.com/treasury-department-is-already-saying-volcker-rule-wont-change-goldman-sachs-2010-2

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Fannie, Freddie Get Tough With Banks

voltron asks: how long before our Treasury Secretary asks them to stop doing this?

Excerpt:

Stuck with about $300 billion in loans to borrowers at least 90 days behind on payments, Fannie and Freddie have unleashed armies of auditors and other employees to sift through mortgage files for proof of underwriting flaws. The two mortgage-finance companies are flexing their muscles to force banks to repurchase loans found to contain improper documentation about a borrower's income or outright lies.

The result: Freddie Mac required lenders to buy back $2.7 billion of loans in the first nine months of 2009, a 125% jump from $1.2 billion a year earlier. Fannie Mae won't disclose its figure, but trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance said Fannie made $4.3 billion in loan-repurchase requests in the first nine months of 2009.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704343104575033543886200942.html

Non paywall version: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=46076124

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Forbes: Short Wells Fargo

Voltron says: Hat tip to "Jeep". Wells Fargo has since repaid the TARP money (just in time to pay themselves bonuses), even though they could not afford it because they did not want to be the only large bank that did not repay.

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/1228/investing-wells-fargo-rf-micro-devices-makers-breakers.html

Sunday, January 24, 2010

SEC mulled national security status for AIG details

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. securities regulators originally treated the New York Federal Reserve's bid to keep secret many of the details of the American International Group bailout like a request to protect matters of national security, according to emails obtained by Reuters.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60N1S220100124?dbk

White House Is Confident Bernanke Will Be Confirmed

Voltron says: The White House remains behind the fed chairman (for
now) and it looks like he will be reappointed next week.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/us/politics/24bernanke.html

Will More Borrowers Walk Away From Their Mortgages?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/business/economy/24view.html

Friday, January 22, 2010

Bonds Are Too Hot

By Matthew Craft - Forbes.com

The flow of money into bond funds has had many welcome knock-on effects. As bond prices rise and yields fall, borrowing costs have dropped, helping companies tap the flood of cash to pay off other more expensive debts. But market watchers at Citigroup are beginning to worry about bonds' newfound popularity.

In a note to clients this week, Citigroup strategists compared the current trend to the craze for technology stocks more than a decade ago. "Such conditions were evident for aggressive growth equity mutual funds during the late 1990s at the apex of the Internet bubble and a similar trend appears to be forming now," wrote Tobias Levkovich and Lorraine Schmitt. They liken the paltry yield on Treasury bills - 6-month bills currently pay 0.13% -- to the high valuations given technology stocks in late 1999.


http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/22/debt-banks-morgan-markets-bonds-investment.html

Many are rejecting loan modifications

Homeowners are opting to flee rather than accept loan modifications that might still leave them underwater on their mortgages.

Desperate homeowners scrambling to get a loan modification through federal foreclosure relief programs are beginning to shun the offer, opting for a strictly business approach to the dilemma -- walking away.

Because the majority of modifications don't reduce the principal payment on loans made during the overpriced boom years, people with underwater mortgages could still be drowning 10 years out.

The better option for those borrowers, some say, is to take the hit now and attempt a short sale, deed in lieu, or even allow their home to go into foreclosure.

http://www.miamiherald.com/business/story/1438896.html

Rep. Frank to Recommend Replacing Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Jan. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Representative Barney Frank said his committee will push to replace Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, seized by regulators almost 17 months ago, with a different model for U.S. mortgage financing.

"The committee will be recommending abolishing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in their current form and coming up with a whole new system of housing finance," Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said at a hearing in Washington today. "That's the approach, rather than a piecemeal one."

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEmQPgp95F_g

New off-balance sheet rule: Little impact on Wells

Excerpt:

The new accounting standard requiring banks to bring assets back on balance sheet had a negligible impact on Wells Fargo. Despite having over $2.0 trillion of off-balance sheet assets, Wells consolidated just $10 billion of risk-weighted assets when the new standard took effect January 1.

http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/01/21/fas-1667-big-bark-but-no-bite-for-wells/

Political pivot point

Wisely Listening to Volcker, Obama Proposes Restrictions on Banks
By Don Bauder - San Diego Reader

Finally showing some backbone and taking advice from former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, President Obama today (Jan. 21) proposed restriction on large banks' abusive practices. Obama's proposal would prohibit commercial banks from owning or investing in hedge funds or private equity funds. Most significantly, the proposal would put restrictions on proprietary trading by the big financial institutions that today can borrow from the Federal Reserve at zero percent and gamble in various markets. The president's proposal would place restrictions on banks using federally-insured deposits for gambling activities. The proposal has to pass Congress, and financial institutions will find loopholes, but initial response is positive -- that is, stocks of these big banks are tanking. At least initially, the market fears that the proposals could stick. That's good.



Voltron says: President Obama is calling this the "Volker Plan". This is significant because according to former bank regulator, Prof. William Black, limiting bank size will cause the ponzi schemes to collapse because all ponzi schemes must continuously grow. This marks the ascendency of former federal reserve bank chairman Paul Volker and the marginalization of President Obama's soon-to-be-former economic team: Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Larry Summers. Tim and Larry were responsible for the big bank bailouts that have backfired politically and, as we will soon see, have only delayed the crisis. Paul Volker raised interest rates aggressively in the early 80s to combat inflation, the this could pre-sage a change in interest rate policy. Also Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's re-appointment is now in doubt.

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/409143/Is-It-Just-Us%2C-Or-Did-Tim-Geithner-Get-Fired-Yesterday

http://www.businessinsider.com/look-whos-smiling-now-2010-1

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60K6NV20100121

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/01/abc-news-senate-leadership-uncertain-if.html

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Wells Fargo reports unexpected 4Q profit

Excerpt:

Wells Fargo set aside $5.91 billion for loan losses during the quarter, a 30 percent decline from the same period a year earlier. Bank of America Corp., which also reported quarterly results Wednesday, actually increased its loan-loss reserves by 18 percent during the final three months of 2009.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Wells-Fargo-reports-apf-300479987.html?x=0&.v=5

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

WSJ: Bad Loans Are Reason to Leave Wells Alone

Excerpt:
Is Wells Fargo going to be dealing with bad-loan problems after its rivals are in the clear? Fourth-quarter results, reported Wednesday, point to such a scenario.

Wells's nonperforming assets—past-due loans and repossessed collateral—rose 18% from the third quarter. Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan Chase's fell 3.1%, Citigroup's were more or less flat, and Bank of America's rose 5.7%.

Investors watch this credit metric closely. As nonperformers start to fall, banks can slash bad-loan expenses, causing earnings to soar. Nearly all bank stocks have rallied as investors factor in such an earnings boost. But, after the rally, there could be upsets if credit metrics fail to improve in line with expectations. And that is why Wells is interesting. It trades at 1.4 times its book value, compared with J.P. Morgan's 1.08 times. If credit disappoints, the stock could fall to close that gap.

Wells's defenders might say the bank has adequate reserves for its loans. But Wells's nonperforming loans are now 3.12% of outstanding loans, compared with 2.77% at J.P. Morgan. Yet J.P. Morgan's reserve is 74% larger than its past-due loan total, whereas Wells's reserve is the same size.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704320104575015411860812160.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs

R U Unemployed?

Visualizing a Trillion

Wells Fargo earnings conference call

Voltron says: all softball questions.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/183514-wells-fargo-amp-company-q4-2009-earnings-call-transcript

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Monday, January 18, 2010

Wells Fargo will answer questions

Voltron says: Wells Fargo, for the first time ever, will answer analysts' questions during their earnings conference call on Wednesday. Hopefully they will let Meredith Whitney ask a question. Should be interesting.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704381604575005532294411268.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs

Friday, January 15, 2010

Short Wells Fargo and give to Haiti

Voltron says: If everybody shorts Wells Fargo and gives 10% of the profits to Haiti, that'll be over $10 Billion in aid.

Big Banks Accused of Short Sale Fraud

excerpt:

In order for a short sale with two loans to happen, the second lien holder has to drop the lien.

If they don't, and there's no short sale, the home goes to foreclosure and the first lien holder gets the house because second liens are subordinated debt to the primary loan.

In short, the second lien holder gets nothing. In order to get the second lien holder to drop the lien, the first lien holder generally negotiates some partial payment to the second lien holder. The second lien holder doesn't have to agree, but more and more are doing so.

That's all legal.

But here's what's not legal and what's apparently happening quite often recently. Since many second lien holders are getting very little, they are now allegedly requesting money on the side from either real estate agents or the buyers in the short sale. When I say "on the side," I mean in cash, off the HUD settlement statements, so the first lien holder doesn't see it.


http://www.cnbc.com/id/34877347/

Banks: The Best Short for 2010

http://seekingalpha.com/article/182696-banks-the-best-short-for-2010?source=yahoo

Friday, January 8, 2010

Banning Chinese Imports Would Make The U.S. Trade Deficit WORSE

If you ban Chinese imports, then Americans will be forced to import products from other non-China sources that are more expensive than China, but still far less expensive than what can be produced within the U.S..


http://www.businessinsider.com/world-bank-the-us-trade-deficit-would-explode-higher-if-you-banned-chinese-imports-2010-1

What happens to a second mortgage in a modification?

Voltron says: This is a huge question for the $800 billion on second lien mortgages (mostly home equity loans) of which Wells Fargo has about $85 billion.

excerpt:

Normally second lien mortgages (which are simply second mortgages taken out on a property) rank subordinate to the first loan. In principle, that means if the property is sold or the borrower defaults, the first lien lender is first in line to get the resulting money, followed by the second lien lender.

But it seems an interesting thing happens when mortgage modifications come into play.

Because the borrower is paying the Hamp-modified first lien amount, and the full second lien amount, the second lien effectively becomes senior to the first. In fact, second lien lenders might even be thought of as benefiting from the first lien mortgage since they have a better chance of getting more of their money back from the borrower.


http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010/01/08/122331/a-second-lien-helping-of-hamp/

How is this efficient?

Thursday, January 7, 2010

NY Times: Walk Away From Your Mortgage!

"HUD-approved housing counselors are supposed to counsel people against foreclosure. In many cases, this means counseling people to throw away money."

Voltron says: Here's how I look at it: If you live in a non-recourse state (i.e. where they can only repossess the house and cannot go after other non-mortgaged assets) then you will pay a higher interest rate because the banks know that they can't sue you for any shortfall should you default for any reason. You are FORCED to pay a higher interest rate, whether or not you would intentionally default. This is the same as saying you are FORCED to pay for an put option on the house. If you are forced to pay for this option, why wouldn't you use it?


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10FOB-wwln-t.html

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Term Deposits at the Fed

Voltron says: so the fed's plan for sopping up all the money they've injected into the system before it causes all kinds of inflation is to offer the banks term deposits of up to one year. Basically selling CDs to the banks so they can earn interest. They have also pledged to keep short term interest rates low, so the banks can borrow money from the fed - basically for free - then give it back to the fed and earn interest. Well, that's one way to keep the banks profitable. The fed issuing debt puts them in direct competition with the Treasury which would raise interest rates. Unless of course, the fed continues to buy treasuries themselves. At the end of a year, the term deposits are returned to the bank (plus interest) so how exactly does this remove the money from the system? It comes back . . . plus interest. So they're just kicking the can down the road (again).

So to recap: The fed is going to lend money overnight at zero interest to banks that will use it to buy one year term deposits from the fed, who will use the money to purchase treasuries from the government to fund the deficit and push long term interest rates low. follow? make sense? no? good. That's because it doesn't make sense. The inmates are running the asylum.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/34616046

2010: Walking away will gain cachet

http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/12/31/2010-walking-away-will-gain-cachet/

Monday, December 28, 2009

Shorting the Economic Recovery

Excerpt:

PERHAPS ONE OF THE greatest failings in the run-up to the financial meltdown was a lack of perspective -- an inability by many market participants to see the big picture. Not so with Kevin Duffy and Bill Laggner, principals of the Dallas-based hedge fund Bearing Asset Management. With the help of their proprietary credit-bubble index, developed in 2004, the managers sounded early warnings on housing and credit excesses, and capitalized handsomely on their forecasts by shorting Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, money-center banks and brokers, builders, mortgage insurers and the like.

Students of the Austrian school of economics, which espouses a free-market philosophy that ascribes business-cycle booms and busts to government meddling with interest rates, the pair is solidly in the contrarian camp, believing that the worst for the markets may be yet to come.

The two established Bearing in June 2002 after running their own money and, before that, a stint by Duffy at Lighthouse Capital Management and by Laggner at Fidelity. Bearing now has about $60 million under management, and they have returned on average an impressive 18.28% annually since setting up shop. They hold refreshingly against-the-grain views on what's ahead.

Voltron says: They are short Goldman Sachs, the S&P500 and US and Japanese bonds and long Gold, consumer staples, discount retailers and pharmaceuticals (GRX and WMT)

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/external/barrons/SIG=11vh3n8h5/*http%3A//online.barrons.com/article/SB126167812677704659.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoobarrons

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Morgan Stanley: Interest Rates Set To Soar 40% As Bond Vigilantes Make Geithner And Obama Pay For Their Mess

Excerpt:

If Morgan Stanley is right, the best sale of U.S. Treasuries for 2010 may be the short sale.

Yields on benchmark 10-year notes will climb about 40 percent to 5.5 percent, the biggest annual increase since 1999, according to David Greenlaw, chief fixed-income economist at Morgan Stanley in New York. The surge will push interest rates on 30-year fixed mortgages to 7.5 percent to 8 percent, almost the highest in a decade

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aiGQrHp46pc4&pos=2

Hat tip to clusterstock.com

Friday, December 25, 2009

Fannie and Freddie even worse

Voltron says: The government is removing all limits on bailouts to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and pays six million in hush money to the CEOs.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasury-uncaps-credit-line-rb-3614762079.html?x=0&.v=3

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ad2b8bETXV8s&pos=6

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Gold wins in the the naughty aughties

Goldman, Deutsche, and the Destructive Use of Synthetic CDOs Come Into Focus

Voltron says: A Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) is a bundle of mortgages that is sliced up and sold. The problem was that demand for CDOs exceeded the number of mortgages, after all, the "boom" in home ownership was only a few percentage points. In order to satisfy demand without having to go through the trouble of actually selling real mortgages, dealers created a derivative called "synthetic CDOs" where the cashflows of a CDO were mimiced by using Credit Default Swaps. The problem is that the sellers of the Credit Default Swaps were often the dealers themselves, so they would benefit from mortgages going bad. Yves Smith at Calculated Risk spins a more sinister plot, claiming that Synthetic CDOs were created specifically by dealers to short the housing market. She weaves together a New York Times article and the book "The Greatest Trade"

The point is just how gigantic this fraudulent derivatives house of cards has become.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/12/goldman-deutsche-and-the-destructive-use-of-synthetic-cdos-comes-into-focus.html

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Wells Fargo repays government bailout

Voltron says: Just in time to pay themselves big bonuses.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Wells-Fargo-repays-government-rb-4254656597.html?x=0&.v=1

The Modern Dark Ages

If our economy ever truly collapses the consequences will make fifth-century Britain seem like a picnic.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4b44d88e-ef39-11de-86c4-00144feab49a.html

Top hedge funds bet on big rise in yields

Excert;

The recent rise in long-term US interest rates comes as good news for several leading hedge fund managers, including John Paulson, who have positioned their trading books to benefit from higher yields on US Treasury securities.

Mr Paulson, who made big gains earlier this decade by betting against the subprime mortgage market and whose firm, Paulson & Co, manages $33bn, has said he believes that government stimulus efforts would inevitably lead to higher inflation and a corresponding rise in rates.

Bond prices fall as yields rise, and Mr Paulson told the Financial Times last week that he has been hoping to benefit in the Treasury market by buying options that would become profitable if rates headed higher. TPG-Axon's Dinakar Singh has been making similar options trades, according to a person familiar with the matter."It will be difficult for the government to withdraw the economic stimulus," Mr Paulson said in a speech. "An increase in the monetary base leads to an increase in the money supply, which leads to inflation."





"Conservative" college savings plan lost 38%

Voltron says: This is why you should do the pre-paid tuition plan and not the 529 college savings plan.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-wed-bright-start-dec23,0,7275727.story

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Mint reveals how it lost a fortune in gold

Voltron says: maybe now they will be able to finish their "system upgrades" and begin opening new gold storage accounts through kitco.

Excerpt:

OTTAWA — More than $3 million in government gold was unwittingly sold off at a fraction of its value as refinery slag, while $8 million more was miscounted and never left the Royal Canadian Mint, the Crown corporation revealed Monday in a full accounting of how it lost track of a fortune in gold for a year.

A series of miscalculations and blunders in the mint's gold refinery dating back to 2005 were responsible for 17,500 troy ounces — a system of weights for precious metals — of gold going missing from the mint's Ottawa inventory count last October, the mint announced in a 12-page report.

That's the equivalent of almost 44,400-ounce bars, worth more than $20 million in today's prices.





Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Oil supplies shifting to Canada from Saudi Arabia



http://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-is-relying-heavily-on-canada-for-crude-oil-2009-12

Target-Date Mutual Funds Take Huge Risks In Junk Bonds

Voltron says: Target Date mutual funds (such as TSP "L" funds) are an easy way to automatically carry out conventional investing practices with your money. They move money over time from what is considered a risky investment (stocks) into what is considered more stable (bonds) as you approach the target date when presumably you will need the money. This doesn't work well if the bonds they choose are risky (junk bonds). Apparently some of these funds are charging quite high fees for funds that really is not much more difficult to manage than an index fund.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/12/target-date-lifestyle-retirement-funds.html

Oh Brother!

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Wells Fargo Gets Special Treatment

http://seekingalpha.com/article/178361-wells-fargo-gets-special-treatment?source=yahoo

Wells Fargo is repaying the government bailout

"Wells is not making money on an operating basis," said Paul Miller, managing director over at FBR Capital Markets (Underperform). "Most of their gains are from trading, and if rates ever go up, they could be in a precarious position."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/34435902/site/14081545

'Substantial’ Bank Losses Are Needed to Fix Housing

Voltron says: Only principal reductions will stem foreclosure, but banks are unwilling because that would wipe out any second mortgages, such as home equity loans. Banks currently have $855 billion in home equity loans at risk.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a6D57m4TPGvs&pos=6

Monday, December 14, 2009

Morgan Stanley’s Roach Sees ‘Great Risk’ in Fed Exit Strategy

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve may cause another crisis by botching the withdrawal of liquidity from the U.S. economy, Morgan Stanley Asia Chairman Stephen Roach said.

The Fed is the "weak link" among central banks and may fail to tighten monetary policy in time to stop asset bubbles from forming, Roach said at a conference in Berlin today. The Fed helped trigger the boom and then bust of the subprime mortgage market by being "quick to slash, slow to normalize" interest rates, he said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aVnNCyH.q1no&pos=7

Greenspan: Bernanke Is Out Of Bullets, Now Inflation Is The Big Risk

Reuters: The U.S. Federal Reserve has done all it can do to reduce unemployment and needs to worry more about the risk of inflation from the stimulus it poured into the economy, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Sunday.

"I think the Fed has done an extraordinary job and it's done a huge amount (to bolster employment). There's just so much monetary policy and the central bank can do. And I think they've gone to their limits, at this particular stage," Greenspan said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

http://www.businessinsider.com/greenspan-bernanke-is-out-of-bullets-here-comes-inflation-2009-12

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Drug money saved the banks

Voltron says: more evidence that the economy is completely dominated by fraud and criminal activity.

From the U.K. Guardian:
Drugs money worth billions of dollars kept the financial system afloat at the height of the global crisis, the United Nations' drugs and crime tsar has told the Observer.

Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were "the only liquid investment capital" available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.

This will raise questions about crime's influence on the economic system at times of crisis.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2009/dec/13/drug-money-banks-saved-un-cfief-claims

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Jim Rogers: Gold not a bubble yet (video)












Matt Taibbi: Obama's Big Sellout

Voltron says: I don't normally get into politics on this board, but I think it's important to understand that no effective reforms will be passed and the government intends to paper over the losses for as many election cycles as our foreign creditors allow. Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone wrote an accurate article about this in his refreshingly vulgar style. First he explains how immediately after the election, Obama appointed to high office, the very people who caused the financial problems. He then goes on to explain the current state of legislation:

But the real kicker came when Frank's committee took up what is known as "resolution authority" — government-speak for "Who the hell is in charge the next time somebody at AIG or Lehman Brothers decides to vaporize the economy?" What the committee initially introduced bore a striking resemblance to a proposal written by Geithner earlier in the summer. A masterpiece of legislative chicanery, the measure would have given the White House permanent and unlimited authority to execute future bailouts of megaconglomerates like Citigroup and Bear Stearns.

Democrats pushed the move as politically uncontroversial, claiming that the bill will force Wall Street to pay for any future bailouts and "doesn't use taxpayer money." In reality, that was complete bullshit. The way the bill was written, the FDIC would basically borrow money from the Treasury — i.e., from ordinary taxpayers — to bail out any of the nation's two dozen or so largest financial companies that the president deems in need of government assistance. After the bailout is executed, the president would then levy a tax on financial firms with assets of more than $10 billion to repay the Treasury within 60 months — unless, that is, the president decides he doesn't want to! "They can wait indefinitely to repay," says Rep. Brad Sherman of California, who dubbed the early version of the bill "TARP on steroids."

The new bailout authority also mandated that future bailouts would not include an exchange of equity "in any form" — meaning that taxpayers would get nothing in return for underwriting Wall Street's mistakes. Even more outrageous, it specifically prohibited Congress from rejecting tax giveaways to Wall Street, as it did last year, by removing all congressional oversight of future bailouts. In fact, the resolution authority proposed by Frank was such a slurpingly obvious blow job of Wall Street that it provoked a revolt among his own committee members, with junior Democrats waging a spirited fight that restored congressional oversight to future bailouts, requires equity for taxpayer money and caps assistance to troubled firms at $150 billion. Another amendment to force companies with more than $50 billion in assets to pay into a rainy-day fund for bailouts passed by a resounding vote of 52 to 17 — with the "Nays" all coming from Frank and other senior Democrats loyal to the administration.

Even as amended, however, resolution authority still has the potential to be truly revolutionary legislation. The Senate version still grants the president unlimited power over equity-free bailouts, and the amended House bill still institutionalizes a system of taxpayer support for the 20 to 25 biggest banks in the country. It would essentially grant economic immortality to those top few megafirms, who will continually gobble up greater and greater slices of market share as money becomes cheaper and cheaper for them to borrow (after all, who wouldn't lend to a company permanently backstopped by the federal government?). It would also formalize the government's role in the global economy and turn the presidential-appointment process into an important part of every big firm's business strategy. "If this passes, the very first thing these companies are going to do in the future is ask themselves, 'How do we make sure that one of our executives becomes assistant Treasury secretary?'" says Sherman.

Voltron says: I think that Obama appointed people he knew from his 12 years as a law professor at University of Chicago where an "efficient market" religion developed, so radical that devotees believed that fraud did not have to be regulated because an efficient market would automatically weed it out without any intervention. This is laughable. Also, I think many people assume that since Republicans support free-markets, that most Wall Street tycoons are Republican when in fact they are almost all "Limousine Democrats" and the Democratic party is enamored with anyone who is somehow able to become rich, because they need money to win elections and most of them cannot fathom how to make money themselves.

Full article: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Meredith Whitney: Government 'Out of Bullets'; Consumers in Trouble (video)












Moody's: USofA leads the way out of AAA

Excerpt:

Moody’s, meanwhile, indicates that a number of sovereign borrowers are moving out of AAA territory by the simple measure of interest payments as a percentage of GDP:



Under US government projections, debt service will exceed 10% of GDP by 2013, which means that by one measure the US will move out of AAA territory. But the UK, Germany and France will be headed in the same direction.

If I am correct that economic weakness continues unabated through the next couple of years, the situation will be considerable worse than the Moody’s graph suggests, and governments will have difficulty funding themselves at today’s extremely low interest rates.

http://blog.atimes.net/?p=1262

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Geithner: “none…would have survived”

Excerpt:

Secretary Geithner acknowledges what most doomsdayers were saying last fall, that without the government’s extraordinary rescue measures, the entire financial system was on the verge of collapse. (Miller/Harper, Bloomberg)

“None of [the big Wall Street insitutions] would have survived” had the government stood aside and let the crisis run its course, he said. “The entire U.S. financial system and all the major firms in the country, and even small banks across the country, were at that moment at the middle of a classic run, a classic bank run.”


Some have said this recent financial crisis wasn’t as bad as the 1930s’. I disagree, and have posted the following chart to make the point.



Voltron says: Of course, the Feds didn't actually fix anything so the collapse is still coming.

http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/12/06/geithner-none-would-have-survived/

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Why Many Home Loan Modifications Fail

Voltron says: to get a permanent mod, you must prove yout income so all the people with "liar" (i.e. stated income) loans won't qualify. The applicant's income and appraised house value must be "goldilocks" (not too low, not too high).

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/04/business/economy/04norris.html

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Credit Default Swaps will be exchage traded

Voltron says: this is supposed to prevent another AIG situation because the exhange will require collateral to be settled daily. My first thought was "wow, I can buy Credit default swaps on wells fargo now". I'm sure they will make the contract size large to discourage Joe six-pack from buying them, but it's sure to cause CDS volumes to rise. If there are no contract limits, nothing stops the people from buying up more CDS than the company is worth, then blowing up the company.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/75922198-dfa1-11de-98ca-00144feab49a.html?referrer_id=yahoofinance&ft_ref=yahoo1&segid=03058

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Wells Fargo will go bust

Voltron: This article suggests that Wachovia will bring down Wells
Fargo, but their home equity loans exposure is at least twice as
large, so they were screwed anyway.

http://blownmortgage.com/2009/12/01/loan-modification-and-mortgage-crisis-could-bring-down-new-banking-giant/

Monday, November 30, 2009

How Economic Weakness Endangers the U.S.

Harvard prof Niall Ferguson predicts higher real interest rates and decreased US military spending.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/224694/page/1

China, gold, and the civilization shift

Mr Jen is an expert on sovereign wealth funds from his days at Morgan Stanley. The gold story — essentially — is that the rising economic powers of Asia, the Middle East, and the commodity bloc are rejecting Western fiat currencies. China, India, and Russia have all been buying gold on a large scale over recent months.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100002252/china-gold-and-the-civilization-shift/

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Still making bad loans



http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-negative-equity-by-vintage-year-2009-11

High End Housing is Weak

Voltron says: high priced houses are not being supported or subsidized by FHA, VA, Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie, First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit, etc., so that is where weakness is showing.



http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/11/25/toscano/660highendhousingweakness112409.txt

Short sellers are returning

Excerpt: Short interest on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq edged
higher in early November, data from the exchanges showed on Tuesday,
signaling that some investors are betting the equity run-up might hit some
turbulence as 2009 winds down.

Voltron says: Fortunately, I got out of all my short positions in March
(http://cfcsux.blogspot.com/2009/03/im-out-of-srs.html). I started
re-shorting Wells Fargo at an average price of $20. (It's $27 now . . .
Ouch) If you're looking for something to short . . . I recommend Wells
Fargo. They are bankrupt 3-4 times over by my estimate.

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idCNN2421092420091124

House Party

Voltron says: how come I never get invited to parties like this?

Excerpt:

•In San Diego County, young people have taken over foreclosed houses for late-night rave parties, says Detective Jeff Lauhon of the San Diego County Sheriff's Office. Lauhon says the culprits were well-organized in some instances: A young couple would get a realtor to give them a tour of a foreclosed house — usually in a rural area on a large property. The woman would distract the realtor while the man surreptitiously left a window open or door ajar. They would then return and invite others for parties that lasted until the wee hours.




Monday, November 16, 2009

Peter Schiff in top form (video)

Voltron says: You know it's time to short when they are openly mocking Peter Schiff on CNBC

Meredith Whitney is bearish (video)

Financials are taking a hit after Meredith Whitney told CNBC that she "hasn't been this bearish in a year."

She's also calling for a "double dip" recession.

StreetInsider bullet-points her comments:

  • the banking sector is "not adequately capitalized today"
  • sees another leg down in the residential real estate market when mortgage rates/prices begin moving lower. To this point, Meredith said she feels that there is still a much bigger risk related to residential mortgage exposure, rather than commercial.
  • says that this market makes "no sense" to her and that there is no fundamentals behind the recent rally in stocks
  • within the banking sector the major difference between the market today and last year is that there is no mark-to-market now.
  • "banks will go back to tangible book value"
  • sell the banks
  • would sit on cash until another leg down in valuation, estimates
  • "everything's expensive right now"
  • expecting a double dip recession, although the second part of "W" will not be as severe












Sunday, November 15, 2009

Goldman Sachs is short Wells Fargo

Voltron says: Wells Fargo is Goldman's second largest short position at -$290 million.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Off Topic: War and Auctions

Paying a Price for the Thrill of the Hunt

By RICHARD H. THALER, The New York Times

Excerpt:

IF a business school professor is running short on cash, there is a sure-fire solution: run a dollar auction game in class.

To start, the professor offers to sell the class a $20 bill. Bidding starts at $1 and goes up in $1 increments. The winner pays the professor whatever the high bid was, and gets the $20. Here’s the catch: the second-highest bidder also has to pay, but gets nothing in return.

Typically, a few brave or stupid students — nearly always male — open the bidding but fairly quickly only two bidders remain and they discover they are in a war of attrition. The bidding slows when someone bids $20, but then resumes with neither wanting to “lose.” If the two students are particularly stubborn, prices can go over $50. (The professor typically gives the money to charity, or claims to.)

The dollar auction game was invented by a pioneer of game theory, Martin Shubik of Yale, and it illustrates the concept of “escalation of commitment.” Once people are trapped into playing, they have a hard time stopping. (Consider Vietnam.) The higher the bidding goes, and the more each bidder has invested, the harder it is to say “uncle.” The best advice you can give anyone invited to play this particular game is to decline.

...

[Swoopo.com] sells new merchandise using unusual auction formats. Let’s concentrate on one of them, the so-called penny auction.

Typically an item — say, a laptop that retails for $1,500, is offered for sale. The bidding starts at a penny, and goes up in one-cent increments, but it costs bidders 60 cents to make a bid. Each auction has a scheduled closing time, but as the deadline nears, that time is extended by 20 seconds whenever someone bids.

The site’s home page displays several attractive objects for sale with closing times fast approaching. It is mesmerizing.

...

What makes this procedure so devilish is that while bidders are looking at what seem to be amazing bargains, the Web site is raking in the money. Because Swoopo collects 60 cents for each penny bid, its revenue is the selling price multiplied by 60. This means that if a computer you covet sells for $100, seemingly a bargain, Swoopo collects $6,000 in revenue, a very juicy profit.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

World gold supply running out

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, UK Telegraph

Aaron Regent, president of the Canadian gold giant, said that global output has been falling by roughly 1m ounces a year since the start of the decade. Total mine supply has dropped by 10pc as ore quality erodes, implying that the roaring bull market of the last eight years may have further to run.

"There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold'," he told The Daily Telegraph at the RBC's annual gold conference in London.

"Production peaked around 2000 and it has been in decline ever since, and we forecast that decline to continue. It is increasingly difficult to find ore," he said.

Ore grades have fallen from around 12 grams per tonne in 1950 to nearer 3 grams in the US, Canada, and Australia. South Africa's output has halved since peaking in 1970.

...

Mr Norman said the "false mine of central banks" had been the only new source of gold supply this decade as they auction off reserves, but they are switching sides to become net buyers.

[Mining company Barrick Gold] is moving fast to wind down the remaining 3m ounces of its infamous hedge book over the next twelve months, an implicit bet on rising gold prices over time.

ETF Investors Are Still Fleeing U.S. Stocks

Tungsten gold

Excerpt:

In early 2008 it was reported that at least some of the gold bars in the vaults at the National Bank of Ethiopia were fake. The discovery was made when bars shipped from Ethiopia to South Africa were returned after they were identified as being gilded steel.

Gilded steel is a very unconvincing form of fake gold because the density of the iron alloy is significantly less. . . . There are two metals that are suitable, from both a density and economic perspective, for manufacturing fake gold - uranium and tungsten.

A Chinese company called Chinatungsten is advertising imitation gold merchandise on its website. The following quote is taken directly from their Tungsten Alloy for Gold Substitution page:

"a coin with a tungsten center and gold all around it could not be detected as counterfeit by density measurement alone ... We are well accustomed to exploit more innovative applications of tungsten products. Gold-plated tungsten is one of our main products."

http://www.tungsten-alloy.com/en/alloy11.htm

http://www.safehaven.com/article-14990.htm

Monday, November 9, 2009

Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower

Excerpt:

The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying.

The senior official claims the US has played an influential role in encouraging the watchdog to underplay the rate of decline from existing oil fields while overplaying the chances of finding new reserves.

The allegations raise serious questions about the accuracy of the organisation's latest World Energy Outlook on oil demand and supply to be published tomorrow – which is used by the British and many other governments to help guide their wider energy and climate change policies.

In particular they question the prediction in the last World Economic Outlook, believed to be repeated again this year, that oil production can be raised from its current level of 83m barrels a day to 105m barrels. External critics have frequently argued that this cannot be substantiated by firm evidence and say the world has already passed its peak in oil production.

Now the "peak oil" theory is gaining support at the heart of the global energy establishment. "The IEA in 2005 was predicting oil supplies could rise as high as 120m barrels a day by 2030 although it was forced to reduce this gradually to 116m and then 105m last year," said the IEA source, who was unwilling to be identified for fear of reprisals inside the industry. "The 120m figure always was nonsense but even today's number is much higher than can be justified and the IEA knows this.

"Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further. And the Americans fear the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to oil resources," he added.

A second senior IEA source, who has now left but was also unwilling to give his name, said a key rule at the organisation was that it was "imperative not to anger the Americans" but the fact was that there was not as much oil in the world as had been admitted. "We have [already] entered the 'peak oil' zone. I think that the situation is really bad," he added.
...
But as far back as 2004 there have been people making similar warnings. Colin Campbell, a former executive with Total of France told a conference: "If the real [oil reserve] figures were to come out there would be panic on the stock markets … in the end that would suit no one."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/09/peak-oil-international-energy-agency

Friday, November 6, 2009

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Fannie Mae Loses $18 BILLION, Needs $15 BILLION More In Aid

http://www.businessinsider.com/fannie-mae-loses-18-billion-needs-15-billion-more-in-aid-2009-11

More on "ruthless default"

Abstract

Despite reports that homeowners are increasingly “walking away” from their mortgages, most homeowners continue to make their payments even when they are significantly underwater. This article suggests that most homeowners choose not to strategically default as a result of two emotional forces: 1) the desire to avoid the shame and guilt of foreclosure; and 2) exaggerated anxiety over foreclosure’s perceived consequences. Moreover, these emotional constraints are actively cultivated by the government and other social control agents in order to encourage homeowners to follow social and moral norms related to the honoring of financial obligations - and to ignore market and legal norms under which strategic default might be both viable and the wisest financial decision. Norms governing homeowner behavior stand in sharp contrast to norms governing lenders, who seek to maximize profits or minimize losses irrespective of concerns of morality or social responsibility. This norm asymmetry leads to distributional inequalities in which individual homeowners shoulder a disproportionate burden from the housing collapse.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/10/government-and-lender-policies-of-fear.html

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Wells Fargo is in denial

Excerpt:

Wells Fargo & Co.'s strategy for modifying troubled Pick-A-Pay mortgages looks like a game of kick-the-can-down-the-road.

The fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets holds about $107 billion in debt tied to option adjustable-rate mortgages, a relic of the U.S. housing boom that allowed borrowers to make small monthly payments in return for increasing their mortgage balance. Many such borrowers now own homes worth far less than they owe in mortgage debt, and most can't afford a full monthly payment that pays down the loan's principal.

To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The San Francisco company is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers' balances for as long as six to 10 years.

Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the worst-hit regions of the U.S. and a rise in consumer income, will eventually cover the bank's underwater Pick-A-Pay debt. "We're banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time," Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.

The move to shift Pick-A-Pay borrowers into interest-only loans helps Wells Fargo avoid hefty write-downs on Pick-A-Pay mortgages that would likely result from foreclosures. But the strategy will leave Wells Fargo holding billions of dollars in mortgage debt tied to distressed properties in battered markets, especially California and Florida.

link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125728972492326499.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs

Gold surges to new record high

Voltron says: the IMF sold 200 tonnes of gold to India for $6.7 Billion. Normally that much supply would crush the price of gold, but instead the price surged. The reason is because the IMF had already announced that it would sell 400 tonnes of gold so the market already factored that in. The fact the India is buying it as reserves to put in a vault, never to see the light of day means that supply is basically gone rather than flooding the market.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.4dadcffd230970c1a66462397286ee1f.381&show_article=1